home

Real Analysis

  1. add Prove that 3 is irrational. Does a similar argument work to show 6 is irrational?

    Solution: Assume, for contradiction, that there exist integers p and q such that gcd(p,q)=1 and: (1)(pq)2=3 Next, equation (1) implies: (2)p2=3q2 This shows that p2 is a multiple of 3. The only way for a perfect square to be a multiple of 3 is if its factors also include 3. Therefore, p must also be a multiple of 3. Let p=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting this into (2) gives: (3k)2=3q2 9k2=3q2 (3)3k2=q2 This shows that q2 is a multiple of 3, and hence, q is a multiple of 3. This contradicts our hypothesis that gcd(p,q)=1. From this reasoning, we can only assume that equation (1) cannot hold for any integers p and q. Thus, 3 is irrational.

    Q.E.D.

    Yes, a similar argument works to show that 6 is irrational. We can replace equation (2) with: (4)p2=6q2 This shows that p is a multiple of 6. Let p=6k and substitute into (4): (6k)2=6q2 36k2=6q2 6k2=q2 This tells us that q is a multiple of 6. By the same reasoning as above, 6 is irrational.

  2. add Show that there is no rational number r satisfying 2r=3

    Solution: Suppose that, for contradiction, there exists a rational number such that 2r=3. Let r=p/q where gcd(p,q)=1 for p,qZ. We will consider three cases:
    1. p/q>0
    2. p/q<0
    3. p/q=0

    Case 1:

    Suppose that p/q>0. Then 2p/q=32p=3q Since 2p is even and 3q is odd for all p,qN, this is a contradiction and no such r>0 exists.

    Case 2:

    Suppose that p/q<0. Without loss of generality, assume that p<0 and q>0. Then 2p/q=12p/q=312p=3q Then 12p<1 while 3q>1. This is a contradiction and no such r<0 exists.

    Case 3:

    Suppose that p/q=0. Then 20=31=3 This is a contradiction and no such r=0 exists.

    Hence, there is no rational number r satisfying 2r=3.

    Q.E.D.